Skip to main content

Coronavirus: Herd immunity and lockdown misinformation persist

Herd immunity

Writing in The Conversation, Wits University academics present a plan to end South Africa’s lockdown and “save the economy”:

“Mitigate the rapid spread of the virus, while allowing for natural immunity in the population to increase gradually.” Is this the discredited herd immunity in another guise? I assume the authors are experts, but here they're promoting a quack proposal. MIT Technology Review:

“Assuming people who get sick do become immune, we have no idea how long they’ll stay immune. Second, assuming they stay immune, we have no idea how long it would take to reach herd immunity.' These are inter alia because of unknowns: how contagious is coronavirus (estimates vary but very); how many infected so far and asymptomatic infections (we don't know to both). 

“Strengthen health care systems to ensure optimal treatment for as many patients as possible, both those with Covid-19 and those with other serious illnesses.” How? There is nothing to back this statement – it's a hope and a wish. Why not include “Find a cure and vaccine”? The public health system in SA (and the world) is under breaking strain already (see New York and US, the richest country).

We must defer to experts and reject conspiracy and denialist alt-facts but didn't mean questionable proposals like the above. Another black mark – one in a long line – for South Africa The Conversation's contributors and SA universities.

The models to follow are South Korea's, Taiwan's and Germany's (and Singapore's?) of mass testing, tracing and isolating. But South Africa is not doing that or only starting to for various reasons – it waited too long and lacks the resources.

Herd immunity for coronavirus and the disease it causes, Covid-19, is discredited. Even with lockdowns and social distancing the spread of infections, and death, is exponential – US, Italy, Spain, UK ... Imagine what it would be without. Herd immunity may work with a virus/disease that has a negligible to nil infections rate – the “R”-factor – and fatality rate and rapidity to mortality from onset.

But coronavirus is highly infectious and it kills quickly.

So no more proposals about herd immunity which means a large portion of the population must be infected and recover never mind die; no promoting dangerous, untested treatments (a small-scale chloroquine trial in Brazil was halted after patients died and displayed arrhythmia and no promoting epidemiological models that may or may not be applicable to south Africa because we just don't know enough about the virus.

Lockdown

 The specious argument doing the rounds is an extended lockdown, which is globally accepted (except those sad rightwing conspiracists and denialists) to mitigate the virus, could be worse than the economic damage ignores the point in the above paragraph and fears of uncontrollable community and second or third wave infections.

Leaders, experts and public including business and employees around the world are wondering how to balance safety and the continued existence of humanity with livelihoods – to eat when it comes down to it. It's a huge dilemma and those talking heads who offer little by way of practical solutions who minimise it are dangerous and irresponsible.

Austria, which has 14000 infections and 384 deaths, is relaxing measures for small shops but strict distancing applies at the risk of fines. Denmark is doing so too. I don't know if that's the solution but any decision must be informed by up to date data which South Africa doesn't have yet.

But paradoxically, those self-taught, overnight experts including in the media who only a month ago never gave coronavirus a thought as it progressed around the globe shall now use SAs unique conditions where it appears lockdown measures are working to justify that the lockdown ought never to have been implemented in the first place.

However, as scientists and government warn, they expect the deluge of cases and to peak in September. Government too mustn't pretend everything is going according to plan. They're behind on testing and tracing and until they test a large portion of the population no one knows what's going on. That's where the efforts must be now before a decision is made about relaxing measures or not.

“Pandemic” is the modern word for “plague”. Since ancient times – before effective medicines – plagues were treated by quarantines, entire cities if necessary. Denialist and alt-fact supremo Trump wanted to quarantine New York and adjacent states (so it must work, hey). There's no cure or vaccine for so the only way to contain Covid-19 is isolation.

It's common sense too. With any infectious and communicable disease including today where there are treatments the protocol is stay away from the patient: measles, chicken pox, flu, etc. If isolation and physical distancing works for small, individual cases, why wouldn't it work on the global scale – communities and countries – with a highly virulent novel virus? Is this the advice denialists also give for Ebola, Marberg, SARS, etc – go about your business?

Denialists are not only irrational, they're bordering on lunacy, the kind of lemming herd mentality (not herd “immunity”, another of their delusions) that makes otherwise sane people believe in doomsday cults.

Last week Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman wrote in the New York Times the lockdown is working but for the economy it's equivalent to a “medical induced coma”, which is a severe but necessary condition to ensure the patient – in this case society and humanity – survives. In fact, that's what Cyril Ramaphosa said in his address last week. Even sceptical leaders like Boris Johnson and Conservative Party intend extending it and agree it's working.

South Africa’s slow response

 Ramaphosa particularly is praised by the smarmy media and others – “Ramaphoria’s” – for the country’s purported rapid response and that it “acted earlier than other nations”. I don't agree – a few perhaps but not most western countries. Charitably, it acted just in time. But really it was a little late.

In fact, like most western hemisphere countries, SA – government and chattering media and public – only woke the first week of March when the first case was recorded but waited a month before implementing the lockdown, a week later than it ought to which I said at the time. I thought mid-March when I saw how people weren't taking social distancing rules seriously.

Even then they were complacent. Politicians and health authorities too like Western Cape health MEC Nomafrench Mbombo who said at the beginning of March “we got this”. At the time the only Covid-19 isolation unit was at Tygerberg Hospital and it took another month to “slowly” prepare an isolation ward at Groote Schuur.

But since the seriousness of the virus has dawned on them, I agree they're acting like the global disaster it is.

Update: For expert opinions on herd immunity and the progression of the virus see here and here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Groote Schuur Hospital's unsatisfactory service: ineffective patient flow

This is an edited version of an email I sent Groote Schuur Hospital's director of outpatients Dr Tunc Numanoglu on March 7. On Thursday 7 I called one of Groote Schuur Hospital’s (GSH) outpatient clinics over a period of an hour about an appointment.   The phone was either engaged, rang unanswered or twice a person who didn't identify which department it is answered, mumbling almost incoherently.   To my question if she's the receptionist to make appointments, she replied that person was “on tea” and will be “back at 9.30” despite it already been 9.45 and the second time 10.30 when I called.   On tea for an hour?   I didn't understand and gave up.   I emailed the hospital’s outpatients director, Dr Tunc Numanoglu, asking him to refer my request to them.  I was at the clinic last October for test results. An appointment for that date was made soon after my previous visit in August.   I waited from 9am until after 2pm to be seen by the doctor ...

Health Professions Council protects 'euthanasia' doctors

The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) has doubled down to protect Groote Schuur Hospital doctors accused of the unauthorised removal of a patient's life support that resulted in death (euthanasia) and hospital and Western Cape Health Department administrators who covered it up.  As I related in a previous  post , on 31 May 2019 the HPCSA's Third Medical Committee of Preliminary Inquiry (committee) exonerated doctors Ahmed Al Sayari, Marcelle Crowther and Mikhail Botha and Trauma Centre head Prof. Andrew Nicol, CEO Bhavna Patel and WCHD head Dr Beth Engelbrecht.  I requested the committee's rationale and doctors' responses but despite promising to do so, they only sent the responses excluding Nicol's second statement (2019) which they refuse to.   The committee and CEO/registrar Dr Raymond Billa, who nominally investigates the public's complaints and assured me they're an "advocate for the public", cleared the doctors based ...

Groote Schuur Hospital CEO Bhavna Patel retires, leaving controversy behind

Groote Schuur Hospital, Western Cape Health Department and NPA cover up death of patient Groote Schuur Hospital's CEO Dr Bhavna Patel retired after 13 years. A public health specialist, she's credited with improvements to the hospital. That may be true. But there's a cold, cynical side to Patel that the fulsome news reports (IOL, News24) do not speak about. Patel retired leaving controversy behind that to an extent insulates the hospital and Western Cape Health Department (WCHD) from the fallout. This is the kind of story, in general and what follows in particular, the media do not publish. In 2017 Patel, Trauma Centre head Andrew Nicol, senior medical officer Ahmed Al Sayari, registrar Marcelle Crowther, junior officer (27-year-old) Mikhail Botha, registrar Mohammed Mayet, and WCHD head Beth Engelbrecht were variously accused of assault, culpable homicide, fraud and violations of national and provincial health laws and policies for the death of a 91-year-old patient on Jul...