Skip to main content

Western Cape Health has no jurisdiction over its doctors, senior official claims

On Wednesday June 1, Western Cape Health Department's (WCHD) officer Dr Saadiq Kariem was interviewed on CapeTalk about access to chronic medications for WCHD patients. He spoke of two options: collection at a department facility or delivery to their homes.

He made it sound so easy. He didn't mention, though, that at many community health clinics aka day hospitals there's a wait, often hours, to simply collect medicines even when clinics already have patients' current scripts on file. I myself tried that - the first time and last time I'd been to a clinic for collection - but left after two hours without even being attended to. I buy my meds which fortunately are not the expensive kind.

People cannot take off hours every month merely to collect meds but the poor have no alternative. I gather problems may be clinic specific.

On a related matter, during an after hours phone call that weekend, Groote Schuur Hospital's chief operating officer Dr Belinda Jacobs told me they - hospital and health department - supposedly have no oversight or jurisdiction over medical heads of departments' "medical decisions" ie diagnoses and treatment of patients. This extends to HODs' subordinates too.

This was in response to my complaints in April about a GSH outpatient clinic's doctors, including urology HOD Prof. John Lazarus', who also attended me, confusing, contradictory, tardy, incomplete and inadequate management of my case and one doctor's rudeness and rough examination.

Jacobs and her colleagues would have us believe management only has oversight and control over soft client service issues. Ironically she agreed that under the National Health Act (and Health Professions Act) WCHD is the service provider - not individual doctors - patients have contact with. As such, WCHD must and does bear responsibility for the full patient experience. (In this country, at private hospitals and clinics, doctors are private contractors.)

She was vague and unresponsive when I asked to whom WCHD doctors are accountable then, and for the sections in health laws that support their assertion. If they are correct, though, why doesn't the public know this?

This is especially relevant when the WC's doctors provide inadequate, faulty or negligent care - practitioners and department jointly share responsibility, not the arm's length relationship she insists there is. 

However, it also indicates WCHD's duplicity, lack of patient-centred approach and inadequacies that independent surveys have reported about too. And it disproves the narrative in some quarters, DA especially, that WC's public health is the best in the country.


Comments

  1. Mr Robot30 September 2022 at 16:34

    They abdicate themselves from specific roles when it suits them best.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Groote Schuur Hospital's unsatisfactory service: ineffective patient flow

This is an edited version of an email I sent Groote Schuur Hospital's director of outpatients Dr Tunc Numanoglu on March 7. On Thursday 7 I called one of Groote Schuur Hospital’s (GSH) outpatient clinics over a period of an hour about an appointment.   The phone was either engaged, rang unanswered or twice a person who didn't identify which department it is answered, mumbling almost incoherently.   To my question if she's the receptionist to make appointments, she replied that person was “on tea” and will be “back at 9.30” despite it already been 9.45 and the second time 10.30 when I called.   On tea for an hour?   I didn't understand and gave up.   I emailed the hospital’s outpatients director, Dr Tunc Numanoglu, asking him to refer my request to them.  I was at the clinic last October for test results. An appointment for that date was made soon after my previous visit in August.   I waited from 9am until after 2pm to be seen by the doctor ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Health Professions Council protects 'euthanasia' doctors

The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) has doubled down to protect Groote Schuur Hospital doctors accused of the unauthorised removal of a patient's life support that resulted in death (euthanasia) and hospital and Western Cape Health Department administrators who covered it up.  As I related in a previous  post , on 31 May 2019 the HPCSA's Third Medical Committee of Preliminary Inquiry (committee) exonerated doctors Ahmed Al Sayari, Marcelle Crowther and Mikhail Botha and Trauma Centre head Prof. Andrew Nicol, CEO Bhavna Patel and WCHD head Dr Beth Engelbrecht.  I requested the committee's rationale and doctors' responses but despite promising to do so, they only sent the responses excluding Nicol's second statement (2019) which they refuse to.   The committee and CEO/registrar Dr Raymond Billa, who nominally investigates the public's complaints and assured me they're an "advocate for the public", cleared the doctors based ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Groote Schuur Hospital CEO Bhavna Patel retires, leaving controversy behind

Groote Schuur Hospital, Western Cape Health Department and NPA cover up death of patient Groote Schuur Hospital's CEO Dr Bhavna Patel retired after 13 years. A public health specialist, she's credited with improvements to the hospital. That may be true. But there's a cold, cynical side to Patel that the fulsome news reports (IOL, News24) do not speak about. Patel retired leaving controversy behind that to an extent insulates the hospital and Western Cape Health Department (WCHD) from the fallout. This is the kind of story, in general and what follows in particular, the media do not publish. In 2017 Patel, Trauma Centre head Andrew Nicol, senior medical officer Ahmed Al Sayari, registrar Marcelle Crowther, junior officer (27-year-old) Mikhail Botha, registrar Mohammed Mayet, and WCHD head Beth Engelbrecht were variously accused of assault, culpable homicide, fraud and violations of national and provincial health laws and policies for the death of a 91-year-old patient on Jul...
Post a Comment
Read more