Skip to main content

Clean audits: much ado about nothing

 Auditor-general of South Africa Tsakani Maluleke recently released the results of 2023/24 municipal audits. Only 34 municipalities received a clean audit.

Clean audit is an SA public audit definition of: financially unqualified and full compliance with legislation (mainly but not exclusively PFMA, MFMA and Treasury regulations) and auditee's ie client's own performance objectives. Incidentally, on the objectives, the AG takes the client's word for their completion or not; it's a tick-box exercise for AG as most of auditing is. 

When Helen "Godzille" Zille was Western Cape premier she railed against audits as being an obstacle to efficient administration (really). She used the example of missing library books in the AG's audit of the WC Library department's financials. This was ignorant nonsense.

Government departments, politicians and media get in a froth about "clean audits". When government audit results are released, media and politicians don't stop talking about who got a clean audit and who didn't. The DA brags about theirs so much one wants to throttle them, figuratively speaking; they're so tiresome.

The financial state of government departments at all levels is bad. But, as then AG Kimi Makwetu told me in an email 2019 (I'd disagreed with WC Health's clean audit - certain performance objectives per their annual report we're incomplete), the only thing that matters is the financial audit result, ie unqualified or not. 

Any auditor will tell you how easy it is to get an unqualified financial audit - the bar is really low. So unless one separates the audit result for each government entity to see which of the three components of the clean audit was not met, their overall financial administration state is not clear unless one inspects individual annual reports. And who had the time or inclination to do that. 

So it's hard to take the AG's apparently concerning report about the decline of municipal clean audits at face value without determining how many failed to get unqualified financials (the most important) and the other. I suspect, as she said, this bad state is mostly due to unauthorised ("irregular") and wasteful spending. Unauthorised is when there no vote - formal approval - for expenditures, not that it's necessarily dodgy. 

Under the Public Audit Amendment Act entities are obliged to remedy the AG's negative findings, rather than it being a recommendation, which is what audit findings really are. But like all good intentions in SA, it's unlikely it's being applied. 

Clean audit is a misnomer when it comes to governance. (I don't think it's used in the private sector except perhaps informally.) AG audits have or had a section called "value for money", rarely if ever done, which is what you're talking about. It's essentially a "good governance" audit. 

These are qualitative audits covering various aspects of the entity eg on HR: how many staff, who reports to whom, how close were tenders to the general market price, what proportion of staff are engaged in constructive work, etc (the proportion of budget spent on salaries is part of the financial audit).  There're not done because audits cost money, time is of the essence and the client pays for it - government departments being audited pay the AG's fees. 

Financial plus VFM audits would give a better - complete even - assessment of the client. The DA annoys with their smug conflation of clean audit and good governance; they're not the same but good financial administration is a component and indicator of the latter. 

The Department of Public Administration conducts or conducted with AG a survey of departments covering about 18 aspects of governance - financial, ethics, service delivery etc. Interesting to note financials covered about 7 of the 18 categories. 

Likely these surveys are no longer done, mediocrity being SA's governance benchmark. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Groote Schuur Hospital's unsatisfactory service: ineffective patient flow

This is an edited version of an email I sent Groote Schuur Hospital's director of outpatients Dr Tunc Numanoglu on March 7. On Thursday 7 I called one of Groote Schuur Hospital’s (GSH) outpatient clinics over a period of an hour about an appointment.   The phone was either engaged, rang unanswered or twice a person who didn't identify which department it is answered, mumbling almost incoherently.   To my question if she's the receptionist to make appointments, she replied that person was “on tea” and will be “back at 9.30” despite it already been 9.45 and the second time 10.30 when I called.   On tea for an hour?   I didn't understand and gave up.   I emailed the hospital’s outpatients director, Dr Tunc Numanoglu, asking him to refer my request to them.  I was at the clinic last October for test results. An appointment for that date was made soon after my previous visit in August.   I waited from 9am until after 2pm to be seen by the doctor ...

Health Professions Council protects 'euthanasia' doctors

The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) has doubled down to protect Groote Schuur Hospital doctors accused of the unauthorised removal of a patient's life support that resulted in death (euthanasia) and hospital and Western Cape Health Department administrators who covered it up.  As I related in a previous  post , on 31 May 2019 the HPCSA's Third Medical Committee of Preliminary Inquiry (committee) exonerated doctors Ahmed Al Sayari, Marcelle Crowther and Mikhail Botha and Trauma Centre head Prof. Andrew Nicol, CEO Bhavna Patel and WCHD head Dr Beth Engelbrecht.  I requested the committee's rationale and doctors' responses but despite promising to do so, they only sent the responses excluding Nicol's second statement (2019) which they refuse to.   The committee and CEO/registrar Dr Raymond Billa, who nominally investigates the public's complaints and assured me they're an "advocate for the public", cleared the doctors based ...

Groote Schuur Hospital CEO Bhavna Patel retires, leaving controversy behind

Groote Schuur Hospital, Western Cape Health Department and NPA cover up death of patient Groote Schuur Hospital's CEO Dr Bhavna Patel retired after 13 years. A public health specialist, she's credited with improvements to the hospital. That may be true. But there's a cold, cynical side to Patel that the fulsome news reports (IOL, News24) do not speak about. Patel retired leaving controversy behind that to an extent insulates the hospital and Western Cape Health Department (WCHD) from the fallout. This is the kind of story, in general and what follows in particular, the media do not publish. In 2017 Patel, Trauma Centre head Andrew Nicol, senior medical officer Ahmed Al Sayari, registrar Marcelle Crowther, junior officer (27-year-old) Mikhail Botha, registrar Mohammed Mayet, and WCHD head Beth Engelbrecht were variously accused of assault, culpable homicide, fraud and violations of national and provincial health laws and policies for the death of a 91-year-old patient on Jul...