Skip to main content

Clean audits: much ado about nothing

 Auditor-general of South Africa Tsakani Maluleke recently released the results of 2023/24 municipal audits. Only 34 municipalities received a clean audit.

Clean audit is an SA public audit definition of: financially unqualified and full compliance with legislation (mainly but not exclusively PFMA, MFMA and Treasury regulations) and auditee's ie client's own performance objectives. Incidentally, on the objectives, the AG takes the client's word for their completion or not; it's a tick-box exercise for AG as most of auditing is. 

When Helen "Godzille" Zille was Western Cape premier she railed against audits as being an obstacle to efficient administration (really). She used the example of missing library books in the AG's audit of the WC Library department's financials. This was ignorant nonsense.

Government departments, politicians and media get in a froth about "clean audits". When government audit results are released, media and politicians don't stop talking about who got a clean audit and who didn't. The DA brags about theirs so much one wants to throttle them, figuratively speaking; they're so tiresome.

The financial state of government departments at all levels is bad. But, as then AG Kimi Makwetu told me in an email 2019 (I'd disagreed with WC Health's clean audit - certain performance objectives per their annual report we're incomplete), the only thing that matters is the financial audit result, ie unqualified or not. 

Any auditor will tell you how easy it is to get an unqualified financial audit - the bar is really low. So unless one separates the audit result for each government entity to see which of the three components of the clean audit was not met, their overall financial administration state is not clear unless one inspects individual annual reports. And who had the time or inclination to do that. 

So it's hard to take the AG's apparently concerning report about the decline of municipal clean audits at face value without determining how many failed to get unqualified financials (the most important) and the other. I suspect, as she said, this bad state is mostly due to unauthorised ("irregular") and wasteful spending. Unauthorised is when there no vote - formal approval - for expenditures, not that it's necessarily dodgy. 

Under the Public Audit Amendment Act entities are obliged to remedy the AG's negative findings, rather than it being a recommendation, which is what audit findings really are. But like all good intentions in SA, it's unlikely it's being applied. 

Clean audit is a misnomer when it comes to governance. (I don't think it's used in the private sector except perhaps informally.) AG audits have or had a section called "value for money", rarely if ever done, which is what you're talking about. It's essentially a "good governance" audit. 

These are qualitative audits covering various aspects of the entity eg on HR: how many staff, who reports to whom, how close were tenders to the general market price, what proportion of staff are engaged in constructive work, etc (the proportion of budget spent on salaries is part of the financial audit).  There're not done because audits cost money, time is of the essence and the client pays for it - government departments being audited pay the AG's fees. 

Financial plus VFM audits would give a better - complete even - assessment of the client. The DA annoys with their smug conflation of clean audit and good governance; they're not the same but good financial administration is a component and indicator of the latter. 

The Department of Public Administration conducts or conducted with AG a survey of departments covering about 18 aspects of governance - financial, ethics, service delivery etc. Interesting to note financials covered about 7 of the 18 categories. 

Likely these surveys are no longer done, mediocrity being SA's governance benchmark. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Western Cape Health has no jurisdiction over its doctors, senior official claims

On Wednesday June 1, Western Cape Health Department's (WCHD) officer Dr Saadiq Kariem was interviewed on CapeTalk about access to chronic medications for WCHD patients. He spoke of two options: collection at a department facility or delivery to their homes. He made it sound so easy. He didn't mention, though, that at many community health clinics aka day hospitals there's a wait, often hours, to simply collect medicines even when clinics already have patients' current scripts on file. I myself tried that - the first time and last time I'd been to a clinic for collection - but left after two hours without even being attended to. I buy my meds which fortunately are not the expensive kind. People cannot take off hours every month merely to collect meds but the poor have no alternative. I gather problems may be clinic specific. On a related matter, during an after hours phone call that weekend, Groote Schuur Hospital's chief operating officer Dr Belinda Jacobs told ...

Did Beth Engelbrecht jump or was she pushed from a burning platform?

Beth Engelbrecht was head of Western Cape Health Department (WCHD) from 2014 to 2020. Her predecessor Craig Househam ran the department from the late 90s. She was succeeded by Keith Cloete from 1 April 2020.  Engelbrecht's departure was a quiet affair. There was a press briefing January 2020 where Cloete was introduced as her successor (at the Western Cape Government's request, she remained to assist him with the COVID pandemic) but no articles in mainstream media about her tenure. The briefing concentrated on Cloete's and department's priorities.  The absence of press coverage was odd because she held a very important post. Compare that to the fulsome articles when Groote Schuur Hospital CEO Bhavna Patel retired in 2024 and about Eastern Cape health head Rolene Wagner's suspension and reinstatement. WCHD's Jonga Magazine (issue 24, 17 March 2020) ran a farewell message from Engelbrecht in which she wished Cloete well and thanked the department, MEC Nomafrench M...

Groote Schuur Hospital CEO Bhavna Patel retires, leaving controversy behind

Groote Schuur Hospital, Western Cape Health Department and NPA cover up death of patient Groote Schuur Hospital's CEO Dr Bhavna Patel retired after 13 years. A public health specialist, she's credited with improvements to the hospital. That may be true. But there's a cold, cynical side to Patel that the fulsome news reports (IOL, News24) do not speak about. Patel retired leaving controversy behind that to an extent insulates the hospital and Western Cape Health Department (WCHD) from the fallout. This is the kind of story, in general and what follows in particular, the media do not publish. In 2017 Patel, Trauma Centre head Andrew Nicol, senior medical officer Ahmed Al Sayari, registrar Marcelle Crowther, junior officer (27-year-old) Mikhail Botha, registrar Mohammed Mayet, and WCHD head Beth Engelbrecht were variously accused of assault, culpable homicide, fraud and violations of national and provincial health laws and policies for the death of a 91-year-old patient on Jul...