Skip to main content

Pandemic denialists PANDA abandoned by media followers

 Pandemic Data and Analytics, better known as Panda, burst onto the scene a year ago with their infamous report the economic consequences of the lockdown would allegedly kill more people than Covid-19.

 The media gave them significant coverage but no one questioned their and front man Nick Hudson’s faulty, mischievous assumptions and analysis.

 Later when they issued a “study” that questioned epidemiological models predicting Covid deaths could exceed 50,000, and they said deaths would not exceed 20,000, the media still reported them, although with less interest.

 But as the pandemic wreaked its heavy toll, Panda fell out of favour and was eventually sidelined.

 Recently Daily Maverick’s Nafeez Ahmed and Rebecca Davis took down Panda – “Kung Flu Panda: dodgy analytics or pandemic propaganda”. But like most of the media, they have a short memory. At the time the media never critically examined Panda for what they obviously are: pandemic denialists. They called them “experts”. 

 Now with hindsight they’re distancing themselves from their careless oversight, downgrading Panda to a far right, conspiracy, unscientific “lobby group” with links to similar organisations worldwide.

 I immediately saw Panda for what they were, though, and wrote criticising them. It’s strange it’s taken particularly media so long to find out, and only following real time evidence of Covid’s wreckage, which always was counter pandemic denialism.

 While Panda’s members are scientific quacks and conspiracy theorists, it’s obvious from the outset their agenda is that of the rightwing and loony far-right, among them big business, like Allan Gray whose CEO Andrew Lapping wrote an op-ed repeating the unsubstantiated theory of the alleged impact of the lockdown, also fulsomely covered by the media; Sanlam subsidiary Santam which refused to pay policy holders for loss of business (Panda co-spokesman Peter Casteldon is a Santam executive) and others that put profits before lives.

 The irony is these pandemic denialists are among the first to hide in their bunkers and jump the line for vaccines like Johann Rupert, a major investor in Sanlam, did.

 As in other matters, South Africa’s media are dire and culpable for not having the competence and interest to interrogate or credulously accept as fact what’s presented. And as I noted before, DM, the self-styled conscience of the nation, is first among them.

 It’s always timely exposing false prophets, but it’s hypocritical when its present critics were among Panda’s original subscribers.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Groote Schuur Hospital's unsatisfactory service: ineffective patient flow

This is an edited version of an email I sent Groote Schuur Hospital's director of outpatients Dr Tunc Numanoglu on March 7. On Thursday 7 I called one of Groote Schuur Hospital’s (GSH) outpatient clinics over a period of an hour about an appointment.   The phone was either engaged, rang unanswered or twice a person who didn't identify which department it is answered, mumbling almost incoherently.   To my question if she's the receptionist to make appointments, she replied that person was “on tea” and will be “back at 9.30” despite it already been 9.45 and the second time 10.30 when I called.   On tea for an hour?   I didn't understand and gave up.   I emailed the hospital’s outpatients director, Dr Tunc Numanoglu, asking him to refer my request to them.  I was at the clinic last October for test results. An appointment for that date was made soon after my previous visit in August.   I waited from 9am until after 2pm to be seen by the doctor ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Health Professions Council protects 'euthanasia' doctors

The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) has doubled down to protect Groote Schuur Hospital doctors accused of the unauthorised removal of a patient's life support that resulted in death (euthanasia) and hospital and Western Cape Health Department administrators who covered it up.  As I related in a previous  post , on 31 May 2019 the HPCSA's Third Medical Committee of Preliminary Inquiry (committee) exonerated doctors Ahmed Al Sayari, Marcelle Crowther and Mikhail Botha and Trauma Centre head Prof. Andrew Nicol, CEO Bhavna Patel and WCHD head Dr Beth Engelbrecht.  I requested the committee's rationale and doctors' responses but despite promising to do so, they only sent the responses excluding Nicol's second statement (2019) which they refuse to.   The committee and CEO/registrar Dr Raymond Billa, who nominally investigates the public's complaints and assured me they're an "advocate for the public", cleared the doctors based ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Groote Schuur Hospital CEO Bhavna Patel retires, leaving controversy behind

Groote Schuur Hospital, Western Cape Health Department and NPA cover up death of patient Groote Schuur Hospital's CEO Dr Bhavna Patel retired after 13 years. A public health specialist, she's credited with improvements to the hospital. That may be true. But there's a cold, cynical side to Patel that the fulsome news reports (IOL, News24) do not speak about. Patel retired leaving controversy behind that to an extent insulates the hospital and Western Cape Health Department (WCHD) from the fallout. This is the kind of story, in general and what follows in particular, the media do not publish. In 2017 Patel, Trauma Centre head Andrew Nicol, senior medical officer Ahmed Al Sayari, registrar Marcelle Crowther, junior officer (27-year-old) Mikhail Botha, registrar Mohammed Mayet, and WCHD head Beth Engelbrecht were variously accused of assault, culpable homicide, fraud and violations of national and provincial health laws and policies for the death of a 91-year-old patient on Jul...
Post a Comment
Read more